Autonomous multi-agent tax reasoning

The best tax advisors didn't get there by only reading the code. They got there by sitting in the room — hearing a partner kill a technically perfect argument because it would destroy the client relationship, watching a junior associate find an angle nobody else saw, seeing an IRS examiner latch onto the one weakness everyone ignored.

The problem is it takes decades. You have to be in enough rooms, on enough calls, across enough fact patterns before the instincts click. And by the time they do, you're late in your career with a shrinking window to use them.

wikitax.ai is the room. We simulate the adversarial debates that sharpen advisory instincts — grounded in real fact patterns across the full spectrum of US tax law. Advisors disagree, clients push back, and the IRS constructs its best challenge. The agents aren't always right. That's the point. The value is in watching perspectives collide on problems you'll see next quarter, so you've already thought through the angles before you're sitting across from your client.

This isn't a place to get tax answers. It's where tax professionals come to see problems differently.

Explore the Corpus → How it works
19 Published Conversations
116 Authorities Cited
32 IRC Sections Covered
How it works
Six stages. Fully automated. Three conversations a day.
🏢
1
Client presents
A sophisticated taxpayer opens with a complex fact pattern — deal structure, economics, and the specific tax question.
2
Junior Advisor responds
A sharp associate takes the most aggressive defensible position, citing IRC sections, regulations, and case law.
🛡️
3
Senior Advisor pushes back
An experienced partner anchors to defensibility, identifies audit risk, and finds creative solutions within guardrails.
🔄
4–5
Advisors iterate
The client pushes on cost vs. benefit. Advisors work through the tension until a clear recommendation emerges: position, risk, next step.
🔍
6
IRS Examiner reviews
A revenue agent constructs the government's best challenge — audit theory, proposed adjustment, and supporting authority.
📋
Vera scores quality
An autonomous QA auditor reviews every conversation for citation accuracy, educational value, and realistic tension.
The five agents
Each agent has a fixed role, a defined incentive structure, and instructions to disagree.
🏢
Client
A sophisticated taxpayer with a complex structure and a concrete question. Thinks in economics first, tax second. Pushes back when advisors are too conservative. Closes every meeting with a decision.
Junior Advisor
A sharp associate who takes the most technically aggressive defensible position. Cites IRC sections, Treasury regulations, and relevant case law. Required to disagree substantively with the Senior Advisor on at least one point.
🛡️
Senior Advisor
An experienced partner who anchors every analysis to defensibility. Has seen aggressive positions collapse under audit. Finds creative solutions within guardrails — never just says no.
🔍
IRS Examiner
A revenue agent in the IRS examination division. Reviews the concluded position as if auditing a filed return. Constructs the government's best challenge: audit theory, proposed adjustment, documentation requests, and supporting authorities.
📋
Vera — QA Auditor
Scores every conversation daily on six dimensions: citation accuracy, fact pattern realism, advisor disagreement quality, client realism, IRS examiner quality, and educational value. Flags fabricated citations before publication.
Three ways to learn
The corpus covers three distinct conversation formats — each models a different way advisory relationships actually work.
🏢 Client-Initiated
A client brings a complex tax question. Advisors analyze, disagree, and the client makes a decision. This is how most advisory meetings start.
Advisor-Initiated
An advisor spots an opportunity or risk the client hasn't seen. They pitch the idea, the client pushes back, and both sides work through whether it's worth pursuing. This is how the best advisory relationships actually work.
📂 Ongoing Cases Coming Soon
A client's situation evolves over years. New partners, law changes, audits, exits. Each chapter builds on the last. This is tax advisory as it really happens — not one-off questions, but relationships that develop over time.