Corpus

Tax conversations, published automatically · 3× daily

✕ Clear
🔍
13 conversations
Partnership Basis Reconstruction: Historical K-1s or Contemporaneous Tracking Required?
Partnerships · Complexity Medium 2026-04-10 10bf397c
Upper Fund LP owns 80% of Lower Fund LP, which sold a portfolio company for $50M gain. Upper Fund's internal books showed $30M basis in its Lower Fund interest, but client sought to reconstruct basis from historical K-1s showing untracked Section 705(a)(1) income allocations and Section 752 liability allocations that could support materially higher basis and reduce gain on distribution.
Upper Fund may report basis reconstruction based on historical K-1s showing undistributed income allocations under IRC § 705(a)(1)(A) and liability allocations under IRC § 752, provided the K-1s const…
705(a)731752basis reconstructiontiered partnershipsliability allocations
📚 10 authorities 4.4 ✓
Pre-Negotiated Partnership Distribution: Legitimate Restructuring or Disguised Sale?
Partnerships · Complexity Very High 2026-04-09 36d9d907
Partnership holding appreciated warehouse ($12M FMV, $4M basis, $3M debt) with two 50% partners seeking divergent exit strategies: one partner wants cash, the other wants Section 1031 exchange. Partners had substantive price negotiations ($11.5-12.5M range) with potential buyer six weeks before contemplating distribution of property to partners as tenants-in-common, with written communications showing exit intent two months prior.
Drop-and-swap structure abandoned as too risky. Distributing partnership property to partners as tenants-in-common after substantive sale negotiations were already underway creates unacceptable risk o…
707(a)(2)(B)disguised saledrop-and-swap1031 exchangepartnership distributionstep transaction
📚 9 authorities 4.4 ✓
Management Fee Waivers: Prospective Capital Gain or Disguised Compensation?
Partnerships · Complexity Very High Advisor-Initiated 2026-04-09 a4126c07
Private equity fund GP converted annual management fees to carried interest under partnership agreement provision allowing management company to annually elect fee waiver. GP reported waived fees ($2M annually) as long-term capital gain at 20% rather than ordinary compensation at 37%. Structure implemented by Big Four firm four years prior; partnership agreement contained 'may elect' language regarding annual fee waiver.
Fee waiver arrangement fails Rev. Proc. 93-27 prospective requirement and constitutes disguised payment for services under IRC § 707(a)(2)(A) and Treas. Reg. § 1.707-2(c). Annual discretionary electio…
disguised payment for servicesmanagement fee waivercarried interestprofits interest707(a)(2)(A)Rev. Proc. 93-27
📚 7 authorities 4.6 ✓
Earnout Sale of Partnership Interest: Immediate 751(a) Recognition or Deferral?
Partnerships · Complexity Very High 2026-04-07 29fc077e
Partner selling 40% interest in fund management partnership for $50M upfront plus $30M EBITDA-based earnout. Partnership holds $15M in uncollected management fee receivables. Dispute centers on whether seller's $6M allocable share of Section 751(a) ordinary income must be recognized at closing or can be deferred to match earnout payments.
Taxpayer must recognize the full $6M Section 751(a) ordinary income at closing regardless of earnout payment timing, unless partnership is accrual-method and previously recognized the fee income (givi…
751(a)751(c)unrealized receivablesinstallment methodearnoutpartnership interest sale
📚 6 authorities 4.4 ✓
Cayman Feeder Election: Legitimate Structuring or Disguised LP Compensation
International · Complexity Low 2026-03-30 bd96343e
$500 million private equity fund with 40% foreign LP capital (European pension funds and Middle Eastern sovereign wealth) considered master-feeder structure with treaty-country blockers to reduce dividend withholding from 30% to 0-5%, but ultimately elected single Cayman feeder accepting statutory withholding rates due to substance and audit risk concerns around treaty limitation-on-benefits provisions.
Fund elected Cayman feeder structure without treaty benefits after determining that genuine substance required to support beneficial ownership under treaty LOB provisions (estimated $300-400K annually…
treaty benefitsLOBlimitation on benefitsbeneficial ownershipblocker corporationsmaster-feeder
📚 8 authorities 4.2 ✓
Immediate FLP Gifting: Legitimate Estate Planning or Transfer Tax Avoidance?
Estate & Gift · Complexity Very High 2026-03-29 ef9f4356
Taxpayer formed FLP to hold eight commercial properties ($40M FMV, $15M debt, $3M annual NOI), contributed all assets individually, retained 2% GP interest with full management control, and gifted 98% LP interests to three children within same month as formation and funding, claiming 30% combined valuation discount.
Taxpayer may proceed with FLP formation and immediate gifting provided partnership is operated with complete legal formalities (separate accounts, entity-level lease execution, documented distribution…
family limited partnershipFLPvaluation discountlack of marketabilitylack of controlSection 2036
📚 5 authorities 4.5 ✓
Fee-to-Carry Restructuring: Entrepreneurial Risk or Disguised Payment?
Partnerships · Complexity High 2026-03-29 85d61fd1
Hedge fund management company restructured compensation from 2% management fee + 20% carry to 0.5% management fee + 25% carry with 6% hurdle and clawback. Fund invests in public securities with 18-month average holding periods, cleared hurdle 4 of last 5 years, GP maintains 3% capital commitment. Restructuring explicitly designed to convert ordinary fee income to capital gains treatment.
Incremental 5% carry allocation represents genuine entrepreneurial risk and qualifies as valid partnership allocation under IRC § 707, not a disguised payment. Structure includes arm's-length negotiat…
disguised paymentcarried interestfee conversion707(a)(2)(A)hedge fundreasonable determinability
📚 6 authorities 4.5 ✓
Drop-and-Swap After Partnership Dissolution: Legitimate Restructuring or Integrated Sale?
Real Estate · Complexity Very High 2026-03-28 a8993562
Family and co-investors held appreciated commercial property ($15M FMV, $4M basis) in partnership-taxed LLC. Majority partner sought to 1031 exchange into individually-owned replacement property while minority partners wanted cash liquidity. Partnership executed formal dissolution distributing property to majority partner and cash to minority partners, followed 60 days later by majority partner's individual Section 1031 exchange into pre-identified Dallas replacement property.
Drop-and-swap structure is defensible under Revenue Ruling 99-6 Situation 1 where partnership undergoes complete liquidation for legitimate business reasons (divergent investment strategies documented…
1031 exchangedrop-and-swapstep-transaction doctrinepartnership liquidationSection 731Section 707 disguised sale
📚 7 authorities 4.3 ✓
Real Estate FLP with Retained Management: Legitimate Business or §2036 Trap?
Estate & Gift · Complexity High 2026-03-28 f548b61c
68-year-old donor contributed six apartment buildings ($30M value, $2M debt) to FLP, retained 1% GP and 30% LP interests, and gifted 69% LP interests to three adult children within three months. Partnership pays donor $200k annual guaranteed payment for management services and distributes remaining $1M NOI proportionally quarterly to all partners including children.
FLP structure is respected for estate and gift tax purposes with 30-35% valuation discount on gifted LP interests. Donor's retained GP management authority does not trigger IRC § 2036 inclusion becaus…
2036FLPvaluation discountguaranteed paymentgeneral partner retained controlstep transaction
📚 9 authorities 4.2 ✓
Private Credit Blockers: Legitimate Structure or Substance-Free Tax Avoidance?
Exempt Organizations · Complexity Medium 2026-03-28 98ac8a07
University endowment investing $50M in private credit fund generating UBTI through loan origination activities, sourcing fees from borrowers, and active credit servicing. Endowment uses wholly-owned Cayman blocker corporation as LP to avoid direct UBTI exposure, accepting 21% corporate tax drag versus potential trust-rate UBTI taxation.
Blocker structure necessary and appropriate. Fund's regular loan origination activities, receipt of sourcing fees paid by portfolio companies (80/20 split to fund), and ongoing borrower relationship m…
UBTIblocker structure501(c)(3)loan originationprivate creditoffshore entity
📚 9 authorities 4.2 ✓
Software IP Contribution to Venture Fund: Remedial Allocations or Valuation Overreach?
Partnerships · Complexity High 2026-03-27 dc37d762
Contributing partner transferred software IP with $50M claimed FMV and $5M basis to venture fund in exchange for 25% capital and 20% carry, creating $45M built-in gain. Partnership elected remedial allocation method under Treas. Reg. §1.704-3(d) to provide institutional LPs with offsetting ordinary deductions while allocating licensing income to contributing partner, avoiding ceiling rule distortions that would arise under traditional method.
Remedial allocation method is appropriate where contributed property has substantial built-in gain and partnership will generate insufficient other income for curative allocations to correct ceiling r…
704(c)remedial allocationsbuilt-in gainceiling rulecontribution valuationsoftware IP
📚 8 authorities 4.2 ✓
Partnership-to-LLC Conversion: Mere Formality or Disguised Sale Triggering Termination?
Partnerships · Complexity Medium 2026-03-26 7c6c1fcf
Delaware general partnership with $180M in real estate assets and $140M nonrecourse debt converted to Delaware LLC via statutory conversion, maintaining identical ownership percentages (80% to 12 LPs, 20% to 2 GPs) and profit-sharing ratios. LPs held $8-10M built-in gains per unit from aggressive cost segregation depreciation.
Statutory conversion from general partnership to LLC with unchanged ownership and economics does not constitute sale or exchange of partnership interests under IRC § 708(b)(1)(B) and therefore does no…
708(b)(1)(B)technical terminationstatutory conversionLLC conversion752 liability shiftnonrecourse debt
📚 9 authorities 4.3 ✓ ▲ 1
Multi-Property Swap-and-Drop: Genuine Partnership Holding or Prearranged Conduit?
Real Estate · Complexity High 2026-03-26 e2305823
Partnership holding appreciated commercial property ($8M basis, $25M FMV) with GP (30%) and three institutional LPs (70%) seeking divergent Section 1031 exchanges—GP targeting Denver multifamily, LPs targeting Phoenix industrial. Partnership executed swap-and-drop: exchanged into both properties, operated 18-24 months with preferential allocations giving each partner economic benefits tied to their preferred asset, then liquidating dissolution distributing properties along pre-negotiated lines.
Structure qualifies for Section 1031 treatment under Revenue Procedure 2002-22 safe harbor because partnership genuinely acquired and operated replacement properties for 18+ months with substantive bu…
1031 exchangeswap-and-dropstep transaction doctrinepartnership substancepreferential allocations704(b) allocations
📚 9 authorities 4.5 ✓